Company’s meeting – a waste of time or a recipe for success
by Shadowmaster on 08/12/09 at 4:47 am
Before I’ll start I want to give credit to the original author of the publisher, as I only know it was published by “Padeh consulting and coaching” (http://www.padeh.co.il/) ynet site (http://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-3814836,00.html) –
I tried to translate it as much as I can and make it less heavier but again, all credits are for “Padeh consulting and coaching”.
Everyone knows the email regarding the up coming company meeting (especially at the end of the year/quarter) – those meetings provide summaries of the company status, passing information and developer values that are needed to the organization and the team spirit.
The Company’s meetings meant to show the office politics and based mostly on preserving the status of the employees as this platform is for updates only it might waste organization resources. Organization resource value increases when it comes to company meeting, as a 5 minute delay in a 10 employees meeting equal to 50 minutes delay, the same as 2 minute phone call equals to 30 minutes waste of time as there is an additional 1 minute that is needed to return to the concept of the meeting.
Eventually even if a meeting starts and ends on time but concludes without any meaningful decision the created damage is bigger than the benefit as the participations feels there wasn’t any progress and they waste their time (in the meeting) for nothing.
In order to prevent what we call “waste of time meeting” we need to have an organized manager that knows what he wants and make sure the meetings shows the desire goals.
For doing that here are need to some steps ‚Before planning the meeting:
- First of all you have to decide if there is a need for the meeting. As you want to share others with the decision that going to be taken and hear them up you have to remember that not everyone has to take part in some of the decisions. A manager has to decide when it’s time to share information with others according to 4 parameters:
- Quality – how much is it important which decision will be accepted?
- Obligation – how much is it important that the employees accept the decision?
- Time – is there enough time to involve everyone or an act has to be taken instantly?
- Trust – do the employees trust the manager to make the right decision?
- You have to rule goals and set up subjects, progress, list of participations, calling relevant employees, and set up a proper time for each subject.
- Make sure the presenters are ready for their presentations, also make copies of relevant reading materiel and sent it to all the participation so they could come ready with proper reference. During the meeting
- Pay attention everything is according to the time tables, as the meeting starts and ends on time, each subject stands in its proper time tables. Doing this show you respect the participations and also good management skills as you know how to organize the company time to the benefit of everyone.
- Creating calm and relaxing environment with appropriate seats arrangement. In order to keep the environment as is, make sure everyone turns off their cells.
- Each decision has to be deal with clear conclusion and an agreed time table that will be supervised at the next company meetings in order to supervise its progress. After the meeting
- Distribute the information and the decision that was discussed in the meeting.
- Follow up the decision that was decided during the meeting, and make sure they stand in the agreed time table.
- Make conclusions regarding the meeting in order to have the most value out of it, and to improve it.
In conclusion, changing meetings management and behavior affects and change the organization behavior. As a manager this requires from you have to be consistent and hold follow up lists regarding the meetings and their progress , keep in mind that when you plan the meetings right you show respect to the ones who participate and to their time
Popularity: 18% [?]





Doron
Dec 8th, 2009
Very good article.in my opinion, company meetings have their value as long as you keep focusing on the reason. other wise, its just waste of time.
Jeff Schreiber
Jan 17th, 2010
I agree with your article. company meetings usaully are a complete waste of time. Here in the United States, those fourth quarter company meeting usually go something like this: We have to increase revenue or decrease expenses. This puts the fear of God into whole company. Everyone knows what decreasing expenses means (i.e., layoffs). So, panic usaully ensues. This causes a complete disruption of the ultimate goals of the company.
Dave Gernbar
Jan 18th, 2010
In Software development projects there is a lot of usage with stand up meetings which take at the most 5 minutes,this reduce the amount of wasted time.
Shadowmaster
Jan 19th, 2010
Hi Dave,
you half way right, those 5 minutes standing meetings are actually 15 minutes “go around meeting” where each one tells everyone what he did yesterday, what he is doing today, and if he needs/can provide help to others… — this method is part of the scrum methodology — keep in mind that companies aren’t always working in this methodology as it doesn’t suit them all.
as someone that took part in scrum meeting it’s good when you are 3–4 people , it’s nice when you are 6–7 , it’s not so good when you are 10–12 , and it’s awful when there are 15+ participates.
I never was a fan of scrum when it comes to small companies where each one had his own niche, as times goes by each one turns professional in his own fields and doesn’t need nor requires the other one help (also others who are in their niche can’t really help).
Shadowmaster
Jan 19th, 2010
btw — the article speaks about company’s meeting, while scrum (those 15 minutes meetings) is a team/small group meeting.